Sustainable practices are spreading rapidly throughout the agricultural and forestry industries. Growing consumer awareness and understanding of climate change, biodiversity losses, the contamination or depletion of water and the increasing scarcity of natural resources is making farmers more conscious of the benefits of sustainable practices. Customers want quality products that benefit the economy, the environment and society.
Sustainability covers an enormous range of activities, from environmental and social standards, to corporate social responsibility and codes of good practice (industry, supply chain or label specific). A relatively new concept with the potential to impact every aspect of 21st century business and consumerism, means sustainability frameworks have been developed by academics, governments and international institutions in great numbers. However, this raft of advice, tools and claims has not clarified issues for producers, traders and consumers. Sustainability has not yet established a consistent meaning.
To implement a coherent sustainability plan requires analysis of the full gamut of data, frameworks and tools. Integrating them into a business or development strategy remains a major challenge. Global trade, international regulation and factors outside the individual’s control (climate, biodiversity, food safety, financial stability) are compounded by the proliferation of sustainability schemes. These factors have led to calls for multi-party co-operation, supported by ‘common rules’ in order to reduce fragmentation, conflicts, mitigate uncertainty and establish a common basis for assessing sustainability.
Tackling these challenges requires, among other things, a common language for sustainability, as well as a holistic approach to assessment and implementation that considers the complexity and relationships of all dimensions of sustainability. While there is now a wide awareness of the sustainability concept, there is also wide interpretation of the definitions and components of sustainability, based on different disciplines and political beliefs and values. There is a need to measure what matters. The dilemma is how to measure what matters to whom and how?
The Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), which has the mandate to improve nutrition, increase agricultural productivity and raise the standard of living in rural populations, at the same time as contributing to global economic growth, has issued a draft Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA) version 2.0 and structured the goals as follows:
GOOD GOVERNANCE: DIMENSION G
Governance is the process of making and implementing decisions (UNESCAP, 2009). For SAFA, this includes the aspects of corporate ethics, accountability, participation, rule of law and holistic management.
|G1 Corporate Ethics||Mission Statement; Due Diligence|
|G2 Accountability||Holistic Audits; Responsibility, Transparency|
|G3 Participation||Stakeholder Dialogue; Grievance Procedures; Conflict Resolution|
|G4 Rule of Law||Legitimacy; Remedy, Restoration and Prevention; Civic Responsibility; Resource Appropriation|
|G5 Holistic Management||Sustainability Management Plan; Full-cost Accounting|
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY: DIMENSION E
To protect the integrity of the earth’s ecosystems, the use of natural resources and the environmental impacts of activities must be managed, such that negative environmental impacts are minimised and positive impacts fostered. In a SAFA, the following themes of environmental sustainability are addressed: atmosphere, water, land, materials and energy, biodiversity and animal welfare.
|E1 Atmosphere||Greenhouse Gases; Air Quality|
|E2 Water||Water Withdrawal; Water Quality|
|E3 Land||Soil Quality; Land Degradation|
|E4 Biodiversity||Ecosystem Diversity; Species Diversity; Genetic Diversity|
|E5 Materials and Energy||Material Use; Energy Use; Waste Reduction and Disposal|
|E6 Animal Welfare||Health and Freedom from Stress|
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE: DIMENSION C
Economic activity involves the use of labour, land and capital to produce goods and services to satisfy peoples’ needs (Jörissen et al., 1999). The economic dimension of SAFA covers the following themes: investment, vulnerability, product safety and quality, and local economy.
|C1 Investment||Internal investment; Community Investment; Long-ranging Investment, Profitability|
|C2 Vulnerability||Stability of Supply; Stability of Market; Liquidity; Risk Management; Stability of Production|
|C3 Product Safety and Quality||Food safety; Food Quality, Product Information|
|C4 Local Economy||Value Creation; Local Procurement|
SOCIAL WELL BEING: DIMENSION S
Social sustainability is about the satisfaction of basic human needs and the provision of the right and the freedom to satisfy one’s aspirations for a better life (WCED, 1987). This applies as long as the fulfilment of one’s needs does not compromise the ability of others or of future generations to do the same (sustainable). Social sustainability is assessed in SAFA by looking at the theme categories of: decent livelihood, fair trading practices, labour rights, equity, human health and safety, and cultural development.
|S1 Decent Livelihood||Right to Quality of Life, Capacity Building; Rights of Fair Access to Land and Means of Production|
|S2 Fair Trading Practices||Responsible Buyers|
|S3 Labour Rights||Employment Relations; Forced Labour; Child Labour; Employee’s Freedom of Association and Right to Bargaining|
|S4 Equity||Non-discrimination; Gender Equality; Support to Vulnerable People|
|S5 Human Health and Safety||Workplace Safety and Health Provisions for Employees; Public Health|
|S6 Cultural Development||Indigenous Knowledge; Food Sovereignty|
SAFA provides a detailed description under each heading referring to existing agreements and a definition of theme and relevance. In addition, objectives for each theme are defined, including core indicators and targets, which include practices and performance.
An additional description addresses the measurement, the performance metric and its final rating.
Since SAFA is a world guideline for sustainable frameworks issued by the FAO, sustainable frameworks are now adjusting their sustainable understanding and interpretation, albeit gradually. A full version of SAFA 2.0 guidelines is accessible through FAO Website.
The Sustainable Agricultural Initiative (SAI) is guided by SAFA. Some 50 major food brands and processors support this initiative. They ask their supply chains to comply with the SAI’s recommendations. At the same time, certification schemes such as ISSC Plus, among others, coordinate their sustainable food supply certification scheme with SAI, and farmer self assessments are to be audited and certified in future.
Food brands and processors are interested in assessing positive compliance of their supply chains. Additionally, they have opted for verification by third party assessors.
Consequently, farmers and the supply chain will soon need to meet these objectives and demonstrate compliance.SGS provides farm education programmes for almost all sustainability standards. We cover topics including verification, establishing customised compliance criteria and certification. They will also be required to seek independent verification and certification from companies like SGS.
For further information, please contact:
Agriculture Audit & Certification Manager
1 places des alpes
t: + 41 (22) 739 94 68